We often get asked by potential customers if they can use SharePoint straight out of the box for effective policy management. It’s a good question and often gets asked from a number of different stances:
- Investing in SharePoint: when organisations choose to invest in Microsoft 365 then compliance teams will inevitably want to know if SharePoint is enough for compliance and can see future potential to use it.
- Little to no policy management in place: some teams have no structure in place for policy management and have been replying on email threads and shared drives. They now want to get their house in order and are looking to see if SharePoint (already being used for other areas of document management) offers an option for a more intentional approach to policy management.
- SharePoint already in use: there are already teams who are using SharePoint Online to store and distribute their policies but have reached the SharePoint policy management limitations of what they can achieve using SharePoint straight out of the box. They may have added some workflows using Power Automate, but it still isn’t enough. The majority of organisations we speak to are in this camp.
- Looking for a new policy management solution: sometimes compliance teams want to transition from an existing policy management solution which might not be fit for purpose and want to see if SharePoint is a viable option.
So, is SharePoint enough for compliance?
The answer is no. SharePoint straight out of the box is not policy management software, and it is not enough. However, it does have some features that help with compliance and policy management.
What SharePoint does well for policy management
Document storage & access
SharePoint stores documents securely, with role-based access control.
Search & discoverability
With good metadata configuration, employees can search for and find policies.
Integration with Microsoft 365
SharePoint connects naturally to Teams, Outlook, and the broader Microsoft environment, lowering barriers to access and supporting familiarity with users.
Version history
SharePoint maintains a version history for documents, which is a basic but important compliance requirement.
Configuration &automation
SharePoint is a highly configurable platform and workflows can be added through Power Automate, supporting with simple editorial workflow, for example.
SharePoint policy management limitations: What it cannot do without significant configuration or customisation
Policy lifecycle automation
Despite the ability to add simple workflows to SharePoint using Power Automate, this is not enough for policy management. Overall SharePoint has no native workflow for assigning policy owners, setting review dates, sending automated reminders when reviews are overdue, and logging all of that for audit.
Employee attestation tracking
SharePoint cannot natively ask employees to read and acknowledge a policy, track who has and has not done so, or produce an audit log of attestations.
Mandatory reads & enforcement
Surfacing a policy in SharePoint does not mean employees have actually read it, and that is an ongoing battle.
Audience targeting
SharePoint can restrict access to documents but cannot automatically surface the right policies to the right employees based on their role, team, or location.
Audit-ready evidence export
SharePoint's audit logs record who accessed a file, but do not produce the timestamped, employee-level acknowledgement record that regulators expect.
Review cycle automation
There is no native alert system that tells you a policy is about to expire and needs review.
Presenting policies in context
SharePoint does not come with a set of configured or optimised views to present policies to different groups of users, or for different roles such as content owners or approvers.
The ‘we’ve configured SharePoint to do it’ scenario
Many organisations have responded to these gaps by building custom Power Automate flows or even introducing custom development. Others have assigned someone to chase reviews by email and track these using a spreadsheet; this approach is highly inefficient and time-consuming.
The SharePoint policy management limitations of custom-built processes are numerous:
- they are dependent on the people who built them and that might be an external agency you no longer work with or an in-house person who has left.
- they can produce significant technical debt and a high maintenance overhead.
- they do not scale.
- they rarely produce the kind of audit trail that a serious regulatory inspection requires.
When SharePoint policy management is possible
SharePoint alone is likely workable if your organisation has:
- fewer than 50 employees.
- a small and relatively static policy library (under 20 documents).
- no serious regulatory exposure requiring formal employee attestation.
- IT resource capable of building and maintaining the configuration and workflows needed.
- a named owner to keep an eye on everything.
When you need to move beyond SharePoint
However, SharePoint policy management is unlikely to be possible for companies that don’t meet the above criteria. If you are already using SharePoint for policy management and you’re experiencing any of the following, then it will be worth looking at other options:
- Your compliance team is spending significant time chasing reviews and attestations that should happen automatically.
- Policies are lapsing unnoticed because there is no automated review cycle.
- You cannot answer ‘has everyone who needs to acknowledge this policy actually done so?’ without building a spreadsheet.
- You are preparing for an audit and cannot easily produce the evidence needed.
- You have grown beyond the size where manual tracking is manageable.
- There is no culture of compliance and policy management is not being taken seriously by stakeholders.
What Microsoft 365-native policy management looks like in practice
A Microsoft 365-native policy management solution like Xoralia has the advantage of using all the SharePoint features that support policy management but then it also fills all the gaps that come with using SharePoint Online out of the box.
A robust policy management solution built for Microsoft 365 should deliver:
- Easy access to policies from the tools that employees are using every day - Microsoft Teams, a SharePoint intranet, Outlook and Microsoft Search.
- The ability to acknowledge policies from Teams and SharePoint, as well as via mobile devices.
- Compliance dashboards that are built in Power BI.
- Flexible workflows to support policy lifecycle management including regular reviews and approvals.
- Policy owners and employees receiving notifications through Outlook.
- Use of existing Entra ID groups for targeting and notifications.
- No data leaving your Microsoft 365 tenant.
- Data residency aligns with your existing policies that already apply to your Microsoft tenant.
- Granular access to support watertight security policies.
- Automation at scale.
- And more!
SharePoint vs dedicated policy management software
| SharePoint | Dedicated platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Document storage & search | Yes | Yes |
| Version history | Yes | Yes |
| M365 / Teams integration | Yes | Yes - accessible via Teams, SharePoint and Outlook. |
| Automated review cycle reminders | No - requires Power Automate build. | Yes |
| Employee attestation tracking | No | Yes |
| Audit-ready evidence export | No | Yes |
| Audience targeting by role/team | No | Yes - assigned by document owners using existing Active Directory groups. |
| AI knowledge checks | No | Yes |
| Real-time compliance dashboards | No - requires Power BI build. | Yes |
| Maintenance overhead | HIGH | LOW |
| Targeted views for different roles | No | Yes - although not present in all solutions. |
Frequently asked questions
Can you do policy management in SharePoint without a third-party tool?
Does Xoralia replace SharePoint?
How much does it cost to add policy management to SharePoint?
About the author

Dan Hawtrey
CEO and product lead
Dan Hawtrey is CEO of Content Formula and the driving force behind Xoralia, a policy management platform built natively on Microsoft 365. Dan writes regularly on policy management, compliance, and the evolving role of AI in how organisations manage knowledge. His articles are grounded in real conversations with the companies and teams using Xoralia day to day.
